Category

Collatz Conjecture Calculator: Hailstone Sequences & 3n+1 Problem

Explore the Collatz conjecture (3n+1 problem): generate hailstone sequences, count steps to reach 1, and find the peak value for any starting integer.

0 calculations

Calculation Parameters

n

Enter Parameters

Fill in the form on the left and click "Calculate"

What is the Collatz Conjecture?

The Collatz conjecture (also known as the 3n+1 problem, the Syracuse problem, or the hailstone conjecture) is one of the most famous unsolved problems in mathematics. Proposed by German mathematician Lothar Collatz in 1937, it is deceptively simple to state but has resisted proof for nearly a century.

Definition of the Collatz Conjecture

Start with any positive integer n. Apply the following rule repeatedly:

  • If n is even: divide it by 2 → n = n / 2
  • If n is odd: multiply by 3 and add 1 → n = 3n + 1

The Collatz conjecture states that no matter which positive integer you start with, you will always eventually reach 1. Once you reach 1, the sequence loops: 1 → 4 → 2 → 1 → ...

Behavior of Collatz Sequences

The sequences behave unpredictably — they can shoot up to enormous values before eventually descending to 1. This erratic up-and-down behavior is why they are called hailstone sequences: like hailstones in a cloud, the numbers rise and fall before finally coming down.

A classic example — starting with 27:

  • The sequence takes 111 steps to reach 1
  • It reaches a peak value of 9,232 at step 77
  • Despite starting at just 27, the sequence climbs to over 9,000 before descending!

How Does Our Collatz Conjecture Calculator Work?

Our calculator takes your starting positive integer and:

  1. Applies the Collatz rule step by step until reaching 1
  2. Counts the total number of steps (also called the stopping time)
  3. Finds the peak (maximum) value reached during the sequence
  4. Shows the full hailstone sequence (or a preview for long sequences)

Why Does This Problem Drive Mathematicians Crazy?

Every starting number ever tried — from 1 to numbers with hundreds of trillions of digits — has been verified to eventually reach 1. But no one has proven it must always be true. Legendary mathematician Paul Erdős said about the Collatz conjecture: "Mathematics is not yet ready for such problems."

As of 2024, the conjecture has been verified for all integers up to approximately 268 (about 295 quintillion), yet a general mathematical proof remains elusive.

Interesting Records

  • Starting number 27: reaches peak 9,232 before coming down — a classic example
  • Starting number 871: takes 178 steps — unusually long for a small number
  • Starting number 6,171: peaks at 975,400 — remarkable growth from a 4-digit start
  • Starting number 77,031: takes 350 steps — one of the longest stopping times under 100,000

Frequently Asked Questions

Has the Collatz conjecture been proven?

No. Despite being simple to state, it remains one of the most famous open problems in mathematics. Many mathematicians believe it is true, but a formal proof has not been found.

Can the sequence go on forever without reaching 1?

No counterexample has ever been found. Either the sequence eventually reaches 1, or it would need to either grow without bound or enter a cycle other than 1→4→2→1. Neither alternative has been observed or proven possible.

What are hailstone numbers?

The terms of a Collatz sequence are called hailstone numbers because they rise and fall repeatedly — like hailstones caught in updrafts inside a storm cloud — before finally hitting ground (reaching 1).

What is the stopping time?

The stopping time (or total stopping time) is the number of steps needed for the sequence to reach 1. For example, starting at 6: 6 → 3 → 10 → 5 → 16 → 8 → 4 → 2 → 1, which is 8 steps.

Are there any practical applications?

The Collatz conjecture is primarily of theoretical interest in mathematics and number theory. It is studied in dynamical systems, ergodic theory, and computational mathematics. Understanding why all sequences converge (if they do) would have deep implications for our understanding of iterative number-theoretic processes.

Calculation History

Loading...